Key Quantitative ResultB324 mean pKa = 7.7672 ± 1.227; fraction pKa 6–8 = 0.752; fraction pKa >9 = 0.188; selected high-state contacts: ND1–B285 OE1 = 2.719 Å and ND1–B285 OE2 = 2.897 ÅMain UncertaintyLarge pKa dispersion; structural-state populations require explicit population analysis or constant-pH MD
M4
Module B is more compact and internally contacted at pH 6.8
Moderate
Structural Evidence
Average and representative structures indicate altered Module B organization
Dynamic / Network Evidence
Module B contacts, radius of gyration, and shape descriptors consistently differ between conditions
Energetic / pKa Evidence
No direct free-energy proof; interpretation is based primarily on conformational metrics
Key Quantitative ResultLast 100 ns: contacts 778.09 ± 13.89 at pH 6.8 vs 748.63 ± 14.51 at pH 7.4; Rg 2.6284 ± 0.0159 nm vs 2.6481 ± 0.0186 nm; asphericity 1.42259 ± 0.07168 nm² vs 1.60608 ± 0.11409 nm²; kappa² 0.09890 ± 0.00345 vs 0.06252 ± 0.00704Main UncertaintyOnly one trajectory per pH; metric differences may include slow conformational drift and are not independent replicates
M5
The histidine-rich regions reorganize dynamically between pH conditions
Moderate to strong
Structural Evidence
Clean histidine-network views place selected pH-sensitive histidines within the global architecture
Dynamic / Network Evidence
ANM, DCCM, and network analyses identify condition-dependent changes in fluctuation and communication patterns
Energetic / pKa Evidence
Ensemble PROPKA identifies several histidines with predicted pKa values within or near the physiological switching range
Key Quantitative ResultA275 Δfprot = 0.1321; A282 = 0.1871; A289 = 0.2750; A296 = 0.2365; B324 = 0.2250; B329 = 0.2503; B332 = 0.1996; ANM fluctuations near A293–A296 are higher at pH 7.4Main UncertaintyAverage-structure visualization lacks side-chain detail; ANM is coarse-grained; PROPKA does not model coupled titration explicitly
M6
Global A–B PB-MMPBSA energy is directionally more favorable at pH 6.8
Moderate directional
Structural Evidence
Global overlays show substantial conformational divergence between trajectory-derived averages
Dynamic / Network Evidence
DCCM and intermodule network analyses indicate altered coupling between conditions
Energetic / pKa Evidence
PB-MMPBSA endpoint calculations were completed using 1001 frames per pH condition; configurational entropy was not included
Key Quantitative ResultΔTOTAL pH 6.8 = +61.43 kcal/mol (SD 59.38; SEM 1.88); ΔTOTAL pH 7.4 = +71.15 kcal/mol (SD 41.03; SEM 1.30); pH 6.8 − pH 7.4 = −9.72 kcal/mol. Component differences: ΔEEL = −315.54, ΔEPB = +225.92, ΔGGAS = −113.00, ΔGSOLV = +103.28 kcal/molMain UncertaintyOne trajectory per pH, correlated frames, no configurational entropy, large framewise dispersion, and no replicate-level uncertainty; the reported framewise SEM should not be interpreted as independent replicate significance